A critical analysis paper asks the writer to make an argument about a particular book, essay, movie, etc

Assignment 3:
Writing Critical Analysis Papers
A critical analysis paper asks the writer to make an argument about a particular book, essay, movie,
etc. The goal is two fold: one, identify and explain the argument that the author is making, and two,
provide your own argument about that argument. One of the key directions of these assignments is often
to avoid/minimize summary – you are not writing a book report, but evaluating the author’s argument.
Potential points of criticism
Sometimes it can seem intimidating to “criticize” a book or article; after all, they are professors and
experienced policymakers. However, part of this exercise is to expose the fact that even though these
authors are highly qualified, they are still advancing an argument and providing evidence–their aim is to
persuade you that their argument is true, not to just present facts. Once you recognize that these authors
are making arguments, you can analyze whether or not you find their argument compelling. Following are
some possible questions you could ask to evaluate arguments:

Theoretical questions – How does the author understand the situation? What is his/her
theoretical background? How would this influence their view of the situation?
o IftheauthorisaclearproponentofWestern,liberalformsofdemocracy,howwillthisinfluence
his/her study of authoritarian states?

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
A critical analysis paper asks the writer to make an argument about a particular book, essay, movie, etc
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Definitional questions- Are all the concepts in the text clear?Does theauthordefineaconcept
vaguely to allow it to travel across different situations? If a concept can relate two seemingly
different situations, is the concept meaningful?
o CanwereallycomparetheexistingcommunistgovernmentinChinatothecommunistgovernment
in the former Soviet Union?

Evidence questions:

o Does the author’s evidence support their argument? Do they have enough specific
evidence to prove the more general point?
Does the revolutionary government in Venezuela reflect a more general trend to the left in
all of Latin America?
o Does the author underemphasize or ignore evidence that is contrary to their argument?
Is an argument compelling if it ignores an obvious exception – Can we really say that
democracies are inherently peaceful given the 2003 Iraq invasion?
o Is the evidence credible? Can you identify a bias in the evidence?
Was the study done by a political action committee, and environmental NGO, or a non-
partisan research group? How might a group affiliation or funding influence the outcome
of research?

Implication/Policy relevance questions – What are the implications of this argument? Are
those implications positive or negative? How has the author dealt with this issue?
o IfWesternmodesofthinkingaretheonlyefficientpathforeconomicdevelopment,whatdoesthis
mean with societies that have different cultures and values?

Other approaches:

o Is the author’s argument consistent throughout the book? Or, does the conclusion seem to
offer a different argument than he/she presented in the introduction?
o Does the author’s background have important implications for their argument?
o Do the specific language choices of the author betray a certain ideology or bias, or frame
the argument in a certain way?
Adopted from J.L. Beyer, “Critically Analyzing an Academic Article or Book”
Structuring a Critical Analysis Paper
Most critical analysis papers begin with a short summary of the work and then dive in to the
argument. Since most of these paper assignments are short, it is important to be concise in all parts of your
analysis. Writing an outline (and following it) is crucial to remain focused on your argument and avoid
summary or irrelevant description. Following is a sample outline for a critical analysis paper:
I.
II.
III.
IV .
Introduction
a. Identifytheworkbeingcriticized

Present thesis – argument about the work

Preview your argument – what are the steps you will take to prove your argument

Short summary of the work
a. Does not need to be comprehensive – present only what the reader needs to know to
understand your argument
Your argument
a. Yourargumentwilllikelyinvolveanumberofsub-arguments–mini-thesesyouproveto
prove your larger argument true. For example, if your thesis was that the author’s
presumption that the world will soon face a “clash of civilizations” is flawed because he
inadequately specifies his key concept, civilizations, you might prove this by:
i. Notingcompetingdefinitionsofcivilizations
ii. Identifying how his examples do not meet the example of civilizations
iii. Arguethatcivilizationissobroadandnon-specificthatitisnotuseful
b. This should be the bulk of the paper – Your professor wants to read your argument
about the work, not a summary.
Conclusion
a. Reflectonhowyouhaveprovenyourargument.
b. Pointouttheimportanceofyourargument(beyonditbeingarequirementforpassingthe
class ?)
c. Note potential avenues for additional research or analysis
Final Reminders

Even though you are potentially only referring to one source, you still need to cite your
information, using either parenthetical citation or footnotes/endnotes.

Double check the assignment to make sure you have covered all the points that your professor has
asked.

Political Science
PS 4464
assignment3_bookreview_1_.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

PERRY – FALL 2017
POLI 490
Assignment 3:
Writing Critical Analysis Papers
A critical analysis paper asks the writer to make an argument about a particular book, essay, movie,
etc. The goal is two fold: one, identify and explain the argument that the author is making, and two,
provide your own argument about that argument. One of the key directions of these assignments is often
to avoid/minimize summary – you are not writing a book report, but evaluating the author’s argument.
Potential points of criticism
Sometimes it can seem intimidating to “criticize” a book or article; after all, they are professors and
experienced policymakers. However, part of this exercise is to expose the fact that even though these
authors are highly qualified, they are still advancing an argument and providing evidence–their aim is to
persuade you that their argument is true, not to just present facts. Once you recognize that these authors
are making arguments, you can analyze whether or not you find their argument compelling. Following are
some possible questions you could ask to evaluate arguments:
•
Theoretical questions – How does the author understand the situation? What is his/her
theoretical background? How would this influence their view of the situation?
o
•
Definitional questions – Are all the concepts in the text clear? Does the author define a concept
vaguely to allow it to travel across different situations? If a concept can relate two seemingly
different situations, is the concept meaningful?
o
•
If the author is a clear proponent of Western, liberal forms of democracy, how will this influence
his/her study of authoritarian states?
Can we really compare the existing communist government in China to the communist government
in the former Soviet Union?
Evidence questions:
o Does the author’s evidence support their argument? Do they have enough specific
evidence to prove the more general point?
Does the revolutionary government in Venezuela reflect a more general trend to the left in
all of Latin America?
o Does the author underemphasize or ignore evidence that is contrary to their argument?
Is an argument compelling if it ignores an obvious exception – Can we really say that
democracies are inherently peaceful given the 2003 Iraq invasion?
o Is the evidence credible? Can you identify a bias in the evidence?
•
Was the study done by a political action committee, and environmental NGO, or a nonpartisan research group? How might a group affiliation or funding influence the outcome
of research?
Implication/Policy relevance questions – What are the implications of this argument? Are
those implications positive or negative? How has the author dealt with this issue?
o
•
If Western modes of thinking are the only efficient path for economic development, what does this
mean with societies that have different cultures and values?
Other approaches:
o Is the author’s argument consistent throughout the book? Or, does the conclusion seem to
offer a different argument than he/she presented in the introduction?
o Does the author’s background have important implications for their argument?
o Do the specific language choices of the author betray a certain ideology or bias, or frame
the argument in a certain way?
Adopted from J.L. Beyer, “Critically Analyzing an Academic Article or Book”
Political Science
PS 4464
Structuring a Critical Analysis Paper
Most critical analysis papers begin with a short summary of the work and then dive in to the
argument. Since most of these paper assignments are short, it is important to be concise in all parts of your
analysis. Writing an outline (and following it) is crucial to remain focused on your argument and avoid
summary or irrelevant description. Following is a sample outline for a critical analysis paper:
I.
II.
III.
IV.
Introduction
a. Identify the work being criticized
b. Present thesis – argument about the work
c. Preview your argument – what are the steps you will take to prove your argument
Short summary of the work
a. Does not need to be comprehensive – present only what the reader needs to know to
understand your argument
Your argument
a. Your argument will likely involve a number of sub-arguments –mini-theses you prove to
prove your larger argument true. For example, if your thesis was that the author’s
presumption that the world will soon face a “clash of civilizations” is flawed because he
inadequately specifies his key concept, civilizations, you might prove this by:
i. Noting competing definitions of civilizations
ii. Identifying how his examples do not meet the example of civilizations
iii. Argue that civilization is so broad and non-specific that it is not useful
b. This should be the bulk of the paper – Your professor wants to read your argument
about the work, not a summary.
Conclusion
a. Reflect on how you have proven your argument.
b. Point out the importance of your argument (beyond it being a requirement for passing the
class ?)
c. Note potential avenues for additional research or analysis
Final Reminders
• Even though you are potentially only referring to one source, you still need to cite your
information, using either parenthetical citation or footnotes/endnotes.
• Double check the assignment to make sure you have covered all the points that your professor has
asked.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP