answer the questions on the discussion, please. there are 4 questions answer them clearly. see the attached file.please do not do it as Essay. I need you to answer each question by order you put the qestion and the answer under it. do not use contractions when you write like ” don’t, can’t, couldn’t etc..”thank you
Unformatted Attachment Preview
In a small village in rural Kenya, a woman bent over an open fire pit in the center of
her hut cooking the evening meal. That morning, she had spent two hours collecting
wood, animal dung, and scrap paper to use as fuel. Now, as she stirred the pot, the
cook fire gave off a steady stream of sooty, acrid smoke, which filled the room despite
a ventilation hole in the roof. The womans young son played dangerously close to the
open flame, while her daughter, coughing from the smoke, tried to read by the weak
light of the fire.
In 2012, a similar scene was repeated in more than 600 million households every day
across the developing world, with devastating effects on human health, the
environment, and economic development.
Indoor air pollution from open cookstoves is a killer. The World Health Organization
has estimated that soot, particles, and smoke from cooking is the fifth worst risk factor
for health in developing countries, causing two million premature deaths a year from
lung and heart disease more than malaria and tuberculosis combined. Open
cookstoves also lead to disfiguring burns, asthma, eye damage, and pregnancy
complications. The effects are greatest on women and young children, who spend the
most time near the hearth.
Women and girls also suffer from head and back injuries, animal attacks, and sexual
violence while searching for and carrying heavy loads of fuel, often far from home.
Time spent collecting fuel is time not spent attending school, working at a paid job, or
running a small business.
Primitive cooking methods also harm the environment. Cutting trees to produce
wood or charcoal leads to deforestation, loss of biodiversity, and watershed
degradation. Moreover, the combustion of biomass in cooking produces more than a
quarter of the worlds black carbon, or soot. Scientists now believe that soot is second
only to carbon dioxide in its overall contribution to global warming. Policymakers
have been intrigued by the fact that while carbon dioxide stays in the atmosphere for
decades, black carbon washes out within days or weeks. Reducing soot in the
atmosphere would thus have a much more immediate effect on global warming than
cutting carbon emissions.
In 2010, the United Nations Foundation, in collaboration with several governments (
including the United States), launched the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves, with
the ambitious goal of 100 by 20 that 100 million households worldwide adopt
clean and efficient cookstoves and fuels by 2020. The alliance recognized that
reaching this goal would require more than money; it would require technical
innovation in fuels and stove design, new mechanisms of financing, and on- theground campaigns to engage users from a wide range of cultures and cooking
traditions. It would also require the support of businesses large and small.
One company that saw an opportunity in the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves
was Dow Corning. In 2011, the Midland, Michigan based maker of silicon- based
materials donated $ 5 million over five years to support the alliance. The firm had
first become inter-ested in the issue when its volunteer Citizen Service Corps
participated in a clean cook-stove project in Bangalore, India. Dow Corning believed
that not only its money, but also its expertise in manufacturing and material science
could be of value to the initiative.
At the same time, motivated by greater attention to the issue, social entrepreneurs
across the globe began generating innovative ideas about how to design, manufacture,
and finance more efficient and cleaner cookstoves potentially a win win for the
environment and human health and well- being.
For example, in the west African country of Ghana, Suraj Wahab founded a small
busi-ness, Toyola Energy Ltd., to produce a cookstove he invented called the gyapa (
good fire). His company constructed the stove from locally sourced materials scrap
metal from construction sites and fired clay liners. Because it was designed to burn
charcoal, a fuel used by 30 percent of Ghanaian households, twice as efficiently as in
an open fire, each stove over the course of its life would prevent the release of globalwarming emis-sions equivalent to the amount generated by a Honda Civic driven for
Wahab had difficulty obtaining needed capital until he partnered with E Co, a clean
energy nonprofit that invested $ 270,000. E Co helped Toyola calculate the carbon
offset value of its cookstoves, which was then monetized and sold to the investment
banking firm Goldman Sachs. By 2011, Toyola employed 150 people and had sold
more than 150,000 cookstoves to eager Ghanaians, who welcomed the cost savings
and health benefits they provided. More than a quarter of the companys revenue
came from the sale of carbon off-sets, helping keep the price to consumers as low as $
Similar stories of creative partnerships were occurring around the globe. In
Bangladesh, Grameen Shakti part of the Grameen family of microcredit
organizations founded by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Mohammed Yunus launched
a program to spread im-proved cookstoves in rural areas. Grameen Shakti provided
technical assistance and loans to entrepreneurs many of them women to set up
small businesses to make, repair, and market cleaner- burning stoves.
The nonprofit Trees, Water, & People, based in Fort Collins, Colorado, built and
distrib-uted almost 50,000 cookstoves in Guatemala. Their stove was an insulated
metal box topped by a removable cooking surface adapted to cooking tortillas and a
chimney pipe to vent smoke through a roof hole. Increased fuel efficiency saved
families about ten dollars a month, in a society in which 80 percent of the population
lived on two dollars a day or less. Other organizations, such as Solar Cookers
International, experimented with ways to harness the power of the sun a
completely renewable, clean, and free source of energy to boil water and cook food.
Contributions like these moved the Alliance closer to its ambitious goal. As we build
a cookstoves market to the scale necessary to combat and defeat this silent killer, said
its executive director in 2011, the strong support and unique expertise of our
partners and champions will be invaluable.
Sources: Igniting Change, Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves, November, 2011,
at www. cleancookstoves. org ; Momentum Continues to Build for Global Alliance
for Clean Cookstoves on First Anniversary, September 23, 2011, at www.
cleancookstoves. org ; World Bank, One Goal, Two Paths: Achieving Universal Access
to Modern Energy in East Asia and the Pacific, 2011; Forest Saving Stoves Program,
at www. treeswaterpeople. org ; Climate Proposal Puts Practicality Ahead of
Sacrifice, The New York Times, January 16, 2012; Turning Carbon into Cash,
Newsweek, December 14, 2009; Black Carbon: The Dark Horse of Climate Change
Drivers, Environmental Health Perspectives, April, 2011; Black Carbon: An
Overlooked Climate Factor, TIME Magazine, November 13, 2009; Turning Carbon
into Cash, Newsweek, December 14, 2009; Clean Cookstoves: Dow Cornings Path
to Public- Private Partnership, http:// dowcorningcitizenservicecorps . wordpress.
com , February 28, 2012; A Quick ( Partial) Fix for an Ailing Atmosphere, Science,
January 13, 2012; and Case Study: Toyola Energy Limited, Ghana, April 2011, at
www. ashdenawards. org .
1. In what ways would the widespread adoption of clean cookstoves address the
global environmental issues discussed in this chapter?
2. In what ways would the widespread adoption of clean cookstoves address the issues
of economic development and poverty discussed in this chapter?
3. Which sectors ( e. g., government, business, civil society) would need to be
involved in a successful campaign to promote clean cookstoves in the developing
world, and what would be the contributions of each?
4. What would be the benefit to multinational corporations, such as Dow Corning, of
participating in this effort?
Purchase answer to see full
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more