Assignment 5: Persuasive Paper Part 3: Possible Disadvantages, Answers, with Visuals

Hello,Attached are the instructions for Assignment 5 (final one), the grading scale, the professor’s feedback for assignment 4 (190 of 200), and a copy of Assignment 4. Thank you, please let me know if additional resources are needed.
eng_215___assignment_5_instructions.docx

assignment_5_grading_scale.docx

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Assignment 5: Persuasive Paper Part 3: Possible Disadvantages, Answers, with Visuals
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

assignment_4_professor_s_feedback.docx

eng_215___assignment_4a.edited.doc

Unformatted Attachment Preview

1. Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable
Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.
Instructors, training on how to grade is within the
Instructor Center.
Assignment 5: Persuasive Paper Part 3:
Possible Disadvantages, Answers, with Visuals
Due Week 10 and worth 250 points
Using feedback from your professor and
classmates, revise Parts 1 and 2, and add Part 3.
Plan to include visuals to illustrate the advantages
of your proposed solution.
Write an eight to ten (8-10) page paper in which
you:
Provide Part I: Revision of A Problem Exists (3-4
pages)
1. Revise your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A
Problem Exists, using feedback from the
professor and classmates.
Provide Part 2: Revision of Part 2: Solution to
Problem and Advantages (3-4 pages)
2. Revise your Persuasive Paper Part 2:
Solution to Problem and Advantages, using
feedback from the professor and classmates.
Develop Part 3: Possible Disadvantages, Answers,
with Visuals (1-2 pages, for 7-9 total pages)
3. Included a defensible, relevant thesis
statement in the first paragraph.
4. State, explain, and support the first
disadvantage (economic, social, political,
environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral,
etc.) to your solution and provide a logical
answer. This should be one (1) paragraph.
5. State, explain, and support the second (and
third if desired) disadvantage (economic, social,
political, environmental, social, equitable,
ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and provide
a logical answer. This should be one or two (12) paragraphs.
6. Include one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that
help illustrate an advantage.
7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and
sentences.
8. Provide a concluding paragraph to
summarize the proposed solution, its
advantages, possible disadvantages, and
answers to the disadvantages. Repeat or
paraphrase your thesis statement.
9. Develop a coherently structured paper with
an introduction, body, and conclusion.
10. Use one (1) or more rhetorical strategy
(ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.
11. Support disadvantages and answers with at
least two (2) additional quality relevant
references. Use at least eight (8) total for Parts
1, 2, and 3. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites
do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting
guidelines:
•
•
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman
font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides;
citations and references must follow APA or schoolspecific format. Check with your professor for any
additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the
assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s
name, the course title, and the date. The cover page
and the reference page are not included in the
required assignment page length.
Note: Submit your assignment to the designated
plagiarism program so that you can make revisions
before submitting your paper to your professor.
The specific course learning outcomes associated
with this assignment are:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Recognize the elements and correct use of a thesis
statement.
Associate the features of audience, purpose, and
text with various genres.
Analyze the rhetorical strategies of ethos, pathos,
logos in writing samples and for incorporation into
essays or presentations.
Correct grammatical and stylistic errors consistent
with Standard Written English. Prepare a research
project that supports an argument with structure and
format appropriate to the genre.
Revise drafts to improve clarity, support, and
organization.
Recognize how to organize ideas with transitional
words, phrases, and sentences.
Incorporate relevant, properly documented sources
to substantiate ideas.
Use technology and information resources to
research selected issues for this course.
Write clearly and concisely about selected topics
using proper writing mechanics.
Click here to view the grading rubric for this
assignment
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a
rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s
layout.
Content
Top of Form
Name: ENG215 Week 7 Assignment 4: Persuasive Paper Part 2 – Solution and Advantages
Description: ENG215 Week 7 Assignment 4: Persuasive Paper Part 2 – Solution and Advantages
Grid View
List View
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
ENG215-A41
1. Revise,
using
feedback
from the
professor
and
classmates,
your
Persuasive
Paper Part
1: A
Problem
Exists.
Weight: 5%
Meets Minimum
Expectations 60- Fair 70-79% C
69% D
Proficient 8089% B
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points
Range: 0
(0%) – 5.98
(2.99%)
Points
Range: 6
(3%) – 6.98
(3.49%)
Points
Range: 7
(3.5%) – 7.98
(3.99%)
Points
Range: 8
(4%) – 8.98
(4.49%)
Did not
submit or
incompletel
y revised,
using
feedback
from the
professor
and
classmates,
your
Insufficientl
y revised,
using
feedback
from the
professor
and
classmates,
your
Persuasive
Paper Part
Partially
revised,
using
feedback
from the
professor
and
classmates,
your
Persuasive
Paper Part
Satisfactoril
y revised,
using
feedback
from the
professor
and
classmates,
your
Persuasive
Paper Part
Exemplary 90100% A
Points: 9.5
(4.75%)
Points
Range: 9
(4.5%) – 10
(5%)
Thoroughly
revised,
using
feedback
from the
professor
and
classmates,
your
Persuasive
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Persuasive
Paper Part
1: A
Problem
Exists.
Meets Minimum
Expectations 60- Fair 70-79% C
69% D
Proficient 8089% B
Exemplary 90100% A
Paper Part
1: A
Problem
Exists.
1: A
Problem
Exists.
1: A
Problem
Exists.
1: A
Problem
Exists.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points:
ENG215-A42
2. Include a
defensible,
relevant
thesis
statement
clearly in
the first
paragraph.
Weight: 5%
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points
Range: 6
(3%) – 6.98
(3.49%)
Points
Range: 7
(3.5%) – 7.98
(3.99%)
Points
Range: 8
(4%) – 8.98
(4.49%)
Insufficientl
y included a
defensible,
relevant
thesis
statement
clearly in
the first
paragraph.
Partially
included a
defensible,
relevant
thesis
statement
clearly in
the first
paragraph.
Satisfactoril
y included a
defensible,
relevant
thesis
statement
clearly in
the first
paragraph.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points
Range: 0
(0%) – 5.98
(2.99%)
Points
Range: 6
(3%) – 6.98
(3.49%)
Points
Range: 7
(3.5%) – 7.98
(3.99%)
Points
Range: 8
(4%) – 8.98
(4.49%)
Did not
submit or
Insufficientl
y explained,
Partially
explained,
Satisfactoril
y explained,
Points
Range: 0
(0%) – 5.98
(2.99%)
Did not
submit or
incompletel
y included a
defensible,
relevant
thesis
statement
clearly in
the first
paragraph.
Feedback:
ENG215-A43
3. Explain a
detailed,
viable
solution
that
supports
your thesis.
This should
Points: 9.5
(4.75%)
Points
Range: 9
(4.5%) – 10
(5%)
Thoroughly
included a
defensible,
relevant
thesis
statement
clearly in
the first
paragraph.
Feedback:
Points: 9.5
(4.75%)
Points
Range: 9
(4.5%) – 10
(5%)
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
be one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Weight: 5%
incompletel
y explained,
in one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs,
a detailed,
viable
solution
that
supports
your thesis.
Meets Minimum
Expectations 60- Fair 70-79% C
69% D
Proficient 8089% B
Exemplary 90100% A
Thoroughly
explained,
in one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs,
a detailed,
viable
solution
that
supports
your thesis.
in one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs,
a detailed,
viable
solution
that
supports
your thesis.
in one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs,
a detailed,
viable
solution
that
supports
your thesis.
in one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs,
a detailed,
viable
solution
that
supports
your thesis.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
ENG215-A44
4. State,
explain, and
support the
first
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution.
This should
be one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Weight:
10%
Feedback:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points
Range: 0
(0%) – 11.98
(5.99%)
Points
Range: 12
(6%) – 13.98
(6.99%)
Points
Range: 14
(7%) – 15.98
(7.99%)
Points
Range: 16
(8%) – 17.98
(8.99%)
Did not
submit or
incompletel
y stated,
explained,
and
supported
the first
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
Insufficientl
y stated,
explained,
and
supported
the first
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
one or two
Partially
stated,
explained,
and
supported
the first
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
one or two
Satisfactoril
y stated,
explained,
and
supported
the first
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
one or two
Points: 19
(9.5%)
Points
Range: 18
(9%) – 20
(10%)
Thoroughly
stated,
explained,
and
supported
the first
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
solution in
one or two
(1-2)
paragraphs.
Meets Minimum
Expectations 60- Fair 70-79% C
69% D
Proficient 8089% B
Exemplary 90100% A
one or two
(1-2)
paragraphs.
(1-2)
paragraphs.
(1-2)
paragraphs.
(1-2)
paragraphs.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points:
ENG215-A45
5. State,
explain, and
support the
second
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution.
This should
be one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Weight:
10%
Points
Range: 0
(0%) – 11.98
(5.99%)
Did not
submit or
incompletel
y stated,
explained,
and
supported
the second
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
one or two
(1-2)
paragraphs.
Feedback:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points
Range: 12
(6%) – 13.98
(6.99%)
Points
Range: 14
(7%) – 15.98
(7.99%)
Points
Range: 16
(8%) – 17.98
(8.99%)
Insufficientl
y stated,
explained,
and
supported
the second
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
one or two
(1-2)
paragraphs.
Partially
stated,
explained,
and
supported
the second
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
one or two
(1-2)
paragraphs.
Satisfactoril
y stated,
explained,
and
supported
the second
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
one or two
(1-2)
paragraphs.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points: 19
(9.5%)
Points
Range: 18
(9%) – 20
(10%)
Thoroughly
stated,
explained,
and
supported
the second
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
one or two
(1-2)
paragraphs.
Feedback:
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Meets Minimum
Expectations 60- Fair 70-79% C
69% D
Proficient 8089% B
Points:
ENG215-A47
6. State,
explain, and
support the
third (and
fourth if
desired)
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution.
This should
be one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Weight:
10%
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points
Range: 12
(6%) – 13.98
(6.99%)
Points
Range: 14
(7%) – 15.98
(7.99%)
Points
Range: 16
(8%) – 17.98
(8.99%)
Insufficientl
y stated,
explained,
and
supported
the third
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
one or two
(1-2)
paragraphs.
Partially
stated,
explained,
and
supported
the third
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
one or two
(1-2)
paragraphs.
Satisfactoril
y stated,
explained,
and
supported
the third
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
one or two
(1-2)
paragraphs.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points
Range: 0
(0%) – 11.98
(5.99%)
Points
Range: 12
(6%) – 13.98
(6.99%)
Points
Range: 14
(7%) – 15.98
(7.99%)
Points
Range: 16
(8%) – 17.98
(8.99%)
Points
Range: 0
(0%) – 11.98
(5.99%)
Did not
submit or
incompletel
y stated,
explained,
and
supported
the third
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
one or two
(1-2)
paragraphs.
Feedback:
ENG215-A48
7. Provide a
concluding
paragraph /
transitional
paragraph
Exemplary 90100% A
Points: 19
(9.5%)
Points
Range: 18
(9%) – 20
(10%)
Thoroughly
stated,
explained,
and
supported
the third
advantage
(economic,
social,
political,
environmen
tal, social,
equitable,
ethical/mor
al, etc.) to
your
solution in
one or two
(1-2)
paragraphs.
Feedback:
Points: 19
(9.5%)
Points
Range: 18
(9%) – 20
(10%)
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
that
summarizes
the
proposed
solution and
its
advantages.
Weight:10%
Did not
submit or
incompletel
y provided a
concluding
paragraph /
transitional
paragraph
that
summarizes
the
proposed
solution and
its
advantages.
Meets Minimum
Expectations 60- Fair 70-79% C
69% D
Proficient 8089% B
Exemplary 90100% A
Insufficientl
y provided a
concluding
paragraph /
transitional
paragraph
that
summarizes
the
proposed
solution and
its
advantages.
Partially
provided a
concluding
paragraph /
transitional
paragraph
that
summarizes
the
proposed
solution and
its
advantages.
Satisfactoril
y provided a
concluding
paragraph /
transitional
paragraph
that
summarizes
the
proposed
solution and
its
advantages.
Thoroughly
provided a
concluding
paragraph /
transitional
paragraph
that
summarizes
the
proposed
solution and
its
advantages.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points: 19
(9.5%)
Points
Range: 0
(0%) – 11.98
(5.99%)
Points
Range: 12
(6%) – 13.98
(6.99%)
Points
Range: 14
(7%) – 15.98
(7.99%)
Points
Range: 16
(8%) – 17.98
(8.99%)
Did not
submit or
incompletel
y developed
a coherently
structured
paper with
an
introduction
, body, and
conclusion.
Insufficientl
y developed
a coherently
structured
paper with
an
introduction
, body, and
conclusion.
Partially
developed a
coherently
structured
paper with
an
introduction
, body, and
conclusion.
Satisfactoril
y developed
a coherently
structured
paper with
an
introduction
, body, and
conclusion.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
ENG215-A49
8. Develop a
coherently
structured
paper with
effective
transitional
words,
phrases,
sentences
and an
introduction
, body, and
conclusion.
Weight:
10%
Points
Range: 18
(9%) – 20
(10%)
Thoroughly
developed a
coherently
structured
paper with
an
introduction
, body, and
conclusion.
Feedback:
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Meets Minimum
Expectations 60- Fair 70-79% C
69% D
Proficient 8089% B
Exemplary 90100% A
Feedback:
ENG215-A410
9. Support
advantage
claims with
at least
three (3)
additional
quality
relevant
references
(at least six
(6) total for
Parts 1 and
2).
Weight:
10%
ENG215-A411
10. Clarity,
writing
mechanics,
and
formatting
requirement
s
Weight:
25%
Points:
Points:
Points
Range: 12
(6%) – 13.98
(6.99%)
Points
Range: 14
(7%) – 15.98
(7.99%)
Does not
meet the
required
number of
references;
all
references
poor quality
choices.
Does not
meet the
required
number of
references;
some
references
poor quality
choices.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points
Range: 0
(0%) – 29.98
(14.99%)
Points
Range: 30
(15%) 34.98
(17.49%)
Points
Range: 35
(17.5%) 39.98
(19.99%)
Points
Range: 40
(20%) 44.98
(22.49%)
More than 8
errors
present
7-8 errors
present
5-6 errors
present
3-4 errors
present
0-2 errors
present
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points:
Points
Range: 0
(0%) – 11.98
(5.99%)
No
references
provided
Feedback:
Show Descriptions
Points:
Points
Range: 16
(8%) – 17.98
(8.99%)
Meets
number of
required
references;
most
references
high quality
choices.
Feedback:
Points: 19
(9.5%)
Points
Range: 18
(9%) – 20
(10%)
Meets
number of
required
references;
all
references
high quality
choices.
Feedback:
Points: 47.5
(23.75%)
Points
Range: 45
(22.5%) – 50
(25%)
Show Feedback
ENG215-A4-1
1. Revise, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem
Exists.
Weight: 5%-Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) – 5.98 (2.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your
Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists.
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 6 (3%) – 6.98 (3.49%)
Insufficiently revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A
Problem Exists.
Fair 70-79% C 7 (3.5%) – 7.98 (3.99%)
Partially revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A
Problem Exists.
Proficient 80-89% B 8 (4%) – 8.98 (4.49%)
Satisfactorily revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A
Problem Exists.
Exemplary 90-100% A 9 (4.5%) – 10 (5%)
Thoroughly revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A
Problem Exists.
Feedback:
ENG215-A4-2
2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph.
Weight: 5%-Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) – 5.98 (2.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first
paragraph.
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 6 (3%) – 6.98 (3.49%)
Insufficiently included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph.
Fair 70-79% C 7 (3.5%) – 7.98 (3.99%)
Partially included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph.
Proficient 80-89% B 8 (4%) – 8.98 (4.49%)
Satisfactorily included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph.
Exemplary 90-100% A 9 (4.5%) – 10 (5%)
Thoroughly included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph.
Feedback:
ENG215-A4-3
3. Explain a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis. This should be one or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Weight: 5%-Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) – 5.98 (2.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that
supports your thesis.
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 6 (3%) – 6.98 (3.49%)
Insufficiently explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your
thesis.
Fair 70-79% C 7 (3.5%) – 7.98 (3.99%)
Partially explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis.
Proficient 80-89% B 8 (4%) – 8.98 (4.49%)
Satisfactorily explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your
thesis.
Exemplary 90-100% A 9 (4.5%) – 10 (5%)
Thoroughly explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your
thesis.
Feedback:
ENG215-A4-4
4. State, explain, and support the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social,
equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
Weight: 10%-Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) – 11.98 (5.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely stated, explained, and supported the first advantage (economic, social,
political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 12 (6%) – 13.98 (6.99%)
Insufficiently stated, explained, and supported the first advantage (economic, social, political,
environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
Fair 70-79% C 14 (7%) – 15.98 (7.99%)
Partially stated, explained, and supported the first advantage (economic, social, …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP