Critical Thinking1 – Healthcare Information Systems

Create an annotated bibliography by evaluating three articles written in the last five years on patient safety and the quality of patient care. Provide a conclusion that demonstrates how health information systems help healthcare organizations meet the patient safety and quality goals.Your paper should meet the following requirements:Be 2-3 pages in lengthInclude at least three scholarly references, in addition to the textbook (attached).Be formatted according to the APA writing format.Review the grading rubric, which is attached.APA Writing Format!Need?s a title page
Font – Use a 12-point
Times New Roman!
Spacing – Double space
all text including the reference list and block quotes on all
Assignments.
All margins should be
set to 1″ on each side of the paper.
Page numbers go in the
upper right corner in the header.
Headers:Page
1 Running head: YOUR TITLE IN
CAPS
1Page 2?
YOUR TITLE IN
CAPS
2The running head goes in the upper left
corner and is in all capital letters. The words “Running head:”
appear only on the cover page.
No Blue and underling
in references (Remove the hyperlink)
References should be on
a separate page********Always good to
break up your paper with subheadings
hcm570_ct_grading_rubric.docx

heatlhcare_information_systems__ch1..pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

PRINT
HCM570: Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 01
Content, Research, and Analysis
Meets Expectation
Approaches Expectation
Below Expectation
Career Development Criteria 10 to 9 PointsIncludes all of
the required components of
the Career Development
Criteria, as specified in the
assignment.
8 to 7 PointsIncludes most of
the required components of
the Career Development
Criteria, as specified in the
assignment.
6 to 5 PointsIncludes some of
the required components of
the Career Development
Criteria, as specified in the
assignment.
Synthesis and Evaluation
8 to 7 PointsSome significant 6 to 5 PointsMajor errors or
but not major errors or
omissions in synthesis and
omissions in synthesis and
evaluation.
evaluation.
10 to 9 PointsDemonstrates
strong or adequate synthesis
and evaluation of patient
safety and care quality or
healthcare reform.
Limited Evidence
4 to 3 PointsIncludes few of
the required components of
the Career Development
Criteria, as specified in the
assignment.
4 to 3 PointsFails to
demonstrate synthesis and
evaluation.
Content, Research, and Analysis
Meets Expectation
Analysis
10 to 9 PointsDemonstrates
strong or adequate
understanding of patient
safety and care quality or
healthcare reform.
Approaches Expectation
8 to 7 PointsSome significant,
but not major, errors or
omissions in understanding
big data and SWOT Analysis
or data quality
characteristics.
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
6 to 5 PointsMajor errors or 4 to 3 PointsFails to
omissions in understanding of demonstrate knowledge of
big data and SWOT Analysis
the materials.
or data quality
characteristics.
Mechanics and Writing
?
Meets Expectation
Approaches Expectation
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
Demonstrates college-level
proficiency in organization,
grammar and style.
10 to 9 PointsProject is
clearly organized, well
written, and in proper format
as outlined in the assignment;
strong sentence and
paragraph structure; few
errors in grammar and
spelling.
8 to 7 PointsProject is fairly
well organized and written,
and in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment;reasonably good
sentence and paragraph
structure; significant number
of errors in grammar and
spelling.
6 to 5 PointsProject is poorly
organized and does not
follow proper paper
format;inconsistent to
inadequate sentence and
paragraph development;
numerous errors in grammar
and spelling.
4 to 3 PointsProject is not
organized or well written, and
is not in proper paper format;
poor quality work;
unacceptable in terms of
grammar and spelling.
Demonstrates proper use of
APA style
10 to 9 PointsProject
contains proper APA
formatting, according to the
CSU-Global Guide to Writing
and APA, with no more than
one significant error.
8 to 7 PointsFew errors in
APA formatting, according to
the CSU-Global Guide to
Writing and APA, with no
more than two to three
significant errors.
6 to 5 PointsSignificant errors
in APA formatting, according
to the CSU-Global Guide to
Writing and APA, with four to
five significant errors.
4 to 3 PointsNumerous errors
in APA formatting, according
to the CSU-Global Guide to
Writing and APA, with more
than five significant errors.
Max Points for Content, Research, and Analysis30
?
?
Max Points for Mechanics and Writing20
Total Points Possible50
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment