Final Project Milestone Two: Causes and Reaction to Controversy

As you complete this milestone, consider the following issues:
•Media Coverage: Assess the impact of media coverage of the case on the judicial process. For instance, how did the news media shape public perception of the case? How did this, in turn, affect the court proceedings? Or, how did the selection of photographs and videos used by the media impact public opinion and the judicial process?
•Fairness: Assess the fairness of the administration of the judicial process in your case. In other words, how fair and equitable was the judicial process?
PLEASE READ THE ATTACHMENT BELOW FOR THE COMPLETE ASSIGNMENT.
cj560_milestone_two_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Final Project Milestone Two: Causes and Reaction to Controversy
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

CJ 560 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: This milestone will allow you to complete the Causes of Controversy and Reaction to Controversy portions of your final project. You will identify and
analyze the underlying cause(s) of the controversy related to the court case. Then explore whether the courts could have taken any alternative courses of
direction that would have remedied the situation more appropriately and effectively.
Prompt: In this milestone, create a draft of the Causes and Reaction to Controversy portions of your final project.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I.
Causes of Controversy
A. Media Coverage: Assess the impact of media coverage of the case on the judicial process. For instance, how did the news media shape public
perception of the case? How did this, in turn, affect the court proceedings? Or, how did the selection of photographs and videos used by the
media impact public opinion and the judicial process?
B. Fairness: Assess the fairness of the administration of the judicial process in your case. In other words, how fair and equitable was the judicial
process? Why did the judicial process cause such a controversy?
II.
Reaction to Controversy
A. Reaction Explanation: Explain the reaction by the criminal justice court system, the media, and local, state, or national politicians to the
perceived equality of the judicial process, supporting your response with specific examples. For instance, were politicians acting in a way that
caused bias? Did local media provide objective coverage of the case? Did national media demonstrate sufficient, in-depth knowledge of the
facts?
B. Reaction Defense: Justify, with evidence, the appropriateness and effectiveness of the court system’s reaction to the controversy during the
trial. Ensure that you communicate your justification clearly and effectively.
C. Alternatives Explanation: How could the court system have responded more appropriately and effectively to the controversy during and after
the trial? In other words, what alternative courses of direction could the court system have taken? How could the judicial system have worked in
a more fair and ethical way?
D. Alternatives Defense: Defend, with evidence, your conclusions about how the court system could have taken an alternative course of direction
that might have remedied the situation more appropriately and effectively. Ensure that you communicate your defense clearly and effectively.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your draft of the Causes of Controversy and Reaction to Controversy portions of your final project will be submitted as a
presentation and must include speaker notes or a transcript. Audio and video are strongly encouraged because of the importance of communication in the
criminal justice profession. Your presentation should have 5–7 slides, although this is a minimum requirement; depending on the controversial court case you
select, you may need more slides to comprehensively analyze your court case. You should use current APA style guidelines for your citations and reference list,
with a minimum of three sources.
Critical Elements
Causes: Media
Coverage
Proficient (100%)
Assesses the impact of media
coverage of the case on the judicial
process
Causes: Fairness
Assesses the fairness of the
administration of the judicial process
of the case
Reaction: Reaction
Explanation
Explains the reaction by the criminal
justice court system, the media, and
local, state, or national politicians to
the perceived equality of the judicial
process, supporting response with
specific examples
Clearly and effectively justifies, with
evidence, the appropriateness and
effectiveness of the court system’s
reaction to the controversy
Reaction: Reaction
Defense
Reaction:
Alternatives
Explanation
Determines how the court system
could have responded more
appropriately and effectively to the
controversy during and after the trial
Needs Improvement (90%)
Assesses the impact of media
coverage of the case on the judicial
process, but response lacks sufficient
detail or has gaps in logic
Assesses the fairness of the
administration of the judicial process
of the case, but with gaps in detail or
logic
Explains the reaction by the criminal
justice court system, the media, and
local, state, or national politicians to
the perceived equality of the judicial
process, but with gaps in detail or
support
Justifies, with evidence, the
appropriateness and effectiveness of
the court system’s reaction to the
controversy, but with gaps in clarity,
effectiveness, or logic
Determines how the court system
could have responded more
appropriately and effectively to the
controversy during and after the trial,
but response has gaps in detail, clarity,
or logic
Not Evident (0%)
Does not assess the impact of media
coverage of the case on the judicial
process
Value
15
Does not assess the fairness of the
administration of the judicial process
of the case.
15
Does not explain the reaction by the
criminal justice court system, the
media, and local, state, or national
politicians to the perceived equality of
the judicial process
15
Does not justify, with evidence, the
appropriateness and effectiveness of
the court system’s reaction to the
controversy
15
Does not determine how the court
system could have responded more
appropriately and effectively to the
controversy during and after the trial
15
Reaction:
Alternatives Defense
Articulation of
Response
Clearly and effectively defends, with
evidence, conclusions about how
court system could have taken an
alternative course of direction that
might have remedied the situation
more appropriately and effectively
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar, spelling,
syntax, or organization
Defends, with evidence, conclusions
about how court system could have
taken an alternative course of
direction that might have remedied
the situation more appropriately and
effectively, but with gaps in clarity,
effectiveness, or logic
Submission has major errors related
to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that negatively impact
readability and articulation of main
ideas
Does not defend, with evidence,
conclusions about how court system
could have taken an alternative course
of direction that might have remedied
the situation more appropriately and
effectively
15
Submission has critical errors related
to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that prevent
understanding of ideas
10
Total
100%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP