LPL Surveillance policy Draft Evaluation Design

I Need Draft Evaluation described in (Number 1) for the surveillance policy on the Lexington Kentucky public library1.This project is an evaluation design for the program, problem, or policy you selected. This week, begin pulling together the many elements of this project into an initial draft, or Draft Evaluation Design. Draft Evaluation design will be submitted in the form of a 11 pages (not including the title or reference pages), double-spaced, APA-formatted paper.Include the following in your Draft Evaluation Design:Describe the program, problem, or policy that you identified.Identify and explain your revised research question and variables to be used in your evaluation.Identify and explain the revised research/evaluation design to be used in your evaluation and how this design addresses issues of validity and reliability.Identify and explain the sampling design to be used in your evaluation and the anticipated size of your sample.Identify and explain the information/data needed for the evaluation. Explain how, specifically, this information will be collected (e.g., what secondary sources you will use and/or what data collection instrument you will use to collect the information). If you plan on using a survey, please include the survey in an appendix to your paper.Use at least 10 scholarly sources from the library that were published within the past five years to support your paper. Be sure to follow APA guidelines when citing your sources.References:MMPA 6480/5480, NPMG 6480/5480, MSEM 6480/5480, MMPP 6480: Applied Research and Evaluation Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2014). Retrieved fromhttp://www.ahrq.gov/ American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). (2014). Retrieved fromhttps://www.aclu.org/racial-justice/racial-profili… American Society for Public Administration (ASPA). (Revised 2013). ASPA code of ethics. Retrieved fromhttp://www.aspanet.org/public/ASPA/Resources/Code_… s/Code%20of%20Ethics1.aspx?hkey=acd40318-a945-4ffc-ba7b-18e037b1a858 Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved June 7, 2014, from www.bls.gov Carnochan, S., Samples, M., Myers, M., & Austin, M. J. (2013). Performance measurement challenges in nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Cave, E., & Holm, S. (2003). Milgram and Tuskegee: Paradigm research projects in bioethics. Health Care Analysis, 11(1), 27–40. Center for Political Communication. (2013). University of Delaware Center for Political Communication: September 2013 national agenda poll. Retrieved from http://www.udel.edu/cpc/research/fall2013/National_Agenda_2013_Topline_Full. pdf © 2014 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 2 of 5 Centers for Disease Control. (2013). 2013 CDC health disparities and inequalities report. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/minorityhealth/CHDIReport.html Delaware Health & Social Services. (2008). 2008 Delaware racial and ethnic disparities: Health status report card. Retrieved from http://www.dhss.delaware.gov/dhss/dph/mh/files/200… Delaware Natural Resources Defense Council. (2011). Testing the waters. Retrieved from http://www.nrdc.org/water/oceans/ttw/sumdel.pdf Edin, K., & Pirog, M. A. (2014). Special symposium on qualitative and mixed-methods for policy analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis Management, 33(2), 345–349. Foley, J. (n.d.). A tale of two worlds. Retrieved June 7, 2014, from http://ensia.com/voices/a-tale-of-two-worlds/ Friends National Resource Center. (2009). Using qualitative data in program evaluation. Retrieved from http://friendsnrc.org/using-qualitative-in-program… Gallup. (n.d.). Retrieved June 8, 2014, from http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx?ref=b Gallup. (2013). How does Gallup polling work? Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/101872/how-does-gallup-…Gallup. (2013). Understanding Gallup’s likely voter procedures for presidential elections. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/111268/how-gallups-like… Garson, G. D. (2009, April 4). Logistic regression. Retrieved fromhttp://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/logisti… Harding, D. J., Wyse, J. J. B., Dobson, C., & Morenoff, J. D. (2014). Making ends meet after prison. Journal of Policy Analysis Management, 33(2), 440–470. © 2014 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 3 of 5 Hatry, H. P. (2013). Sorting the relationships among performance measurement, program evaluation, and performance management. New Directions for Evaluation, 2013(137), 19–32. Hill, J. (n.d.). Introduction to descriptive statistics. University of Illinois, Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Retrieved June 7, 2014, fromhttp://mste.illinois.edu/hill/dstat/dstat.html Johnson, G. (2014). Research methods for public administrators (3rd ed.). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Jones, J. M. (2014, January). Record-high 42% of Americans identify as independents. Gallup Politics. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/166763/record-highameri… Laureate Education (Producer). (2013a). Central tendency and variability [Multimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Laureate Education (Producer). (2014). Correlation and introduction to regression. [Multimedia file] Baltimore, MD: Author. Laureate Education. . (2013b). New Harbor, Delaware and sampling design. . Baltimore, MD: Author. Laureate Education (Producer). (2013c). Virtual community. [Multimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Lee Abbott, M., & McKinney, J. (2012). Learning from populations: Censuses and samples. In Understanding and applying research design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. © 2014 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 4 of 5 Litman, T. (2008). Evaluating research quality: Guidelines for scholarship. Victoria, British Columbia: Victoria Transport Quality Institute. McCauley, C. (2012). Testing theories of radicalization in polls of U.S. Muslims. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 12(1), 296–311. Public Policy Polling. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/ Public Policy Research. (2002). Comparing recyclers and nonrecyclers in N/NE Portland: Implications for increasing participation in the curbside program. Retrieved from http://www.publicpolicyresearch.net/documents/recy… Randles, J. M. (2014). Partnering and parenting in poverty: A qualitative analysis of a relationship skills program for low-income, unmarried families. Journal of Policy Analysis Management, 33(2), 385–412. Rasmussen Reports. (2014). Daily presidential tracking poll. Retrieved fromhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/pol…daily_presidential_tracking_poll Silver, N. (2012). Which polls fared best (and worst) in the 2012 presidential election? New York Times, November 12, 2012. Retrieved fromhttp://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/1… State of Delaware Division of Watershed Stewardship. (2014). Retrieved fromhttp://www.dnrec.delaware.gov/swc/wa/Pages/Polluti… utaryActionTeams.aspx StatPac. (2009). Qualities of a good question. Retrieved fromhttp://www.statpac.com/surveys/question-qualities…. © 2014 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 5 of 5 Surveyspro. (2009). Reporting survey results. Retrieved fromhttp://www.esurveyspro.com/article-reporting-surve… Taber, D. R., Chriqui, J. F., Powell, L., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2013). Association between state laws governing school meal nutrition content and student weight status: Implications for new USDA school meal standards. JAMA Pediatrics, 167(6), 513–519. Trochim, W. M. K. (2006, October 20). Inferential statistics. Retrieved fromhttp://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statinf.ph… United Nations. (n.d.). Official documents and bibliographic databases. Retrieved June 7, 2014, from http://www.un.org/en/databases/ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2014). Retrieved from http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations Vaterlaus, J., & Higginbotham, B. (2011). Qualitative program evaluation methods. NCSU: Raleigh, NC. Retrieved from http://ncsu.edu/ffci/publications/2011/v16- n1-2011-spring/vaterlaus-higginbotham.php Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2004). Outcome of Washington state’s research-based programs for juvenile offenders. Retrieved fromwww.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/852
mmpa_6480_final_project_description.docx

dominic_norwood_research_eval_wk_3_assign.docx

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
LPL Surveillance policy Draft Evaluation Design
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Unformatted Attachment Preview

The purpose of the Final Project is to apply what you learn about research and evaluation design
methods to the evaluation of a program, problem, or policy in the organization. This is merely an
evaluation design. You are not required to collect data and implement the research to evaluate the
program.
Your Final Project will be submitted in the form of a 15 (not including the title or reference pages),
double-spaced, APA-formatted paper. You must complete the following elements:
•
Create and include a title page with your name, the course name, and the title of the research
project.
•
Write an Executive Summary that briefly describes the highlights of the evaluation design and the
program, problem, or policy it is intended to evaluate.
•
Briefly describe the organization and include a brief history of the organization as well as information
about the purpose of the organization.
•
Describe the program, problem, or policy to be evaluated, include information regarding the purpose
of the program, problem, or policy, and explain why conducting this research to evaluate the
program, problem, or policy is important to this organization.
•
Describe the research question(s) and hypothesis(es). Clearly articulate them so that you would be
able to answer the research questions using the design you develop.
•
Explain the evaluation design (i.e., descriptive, associational, causal) that is most appropriate to
evaluate the program, problem, or policy. Justify the use of the evaluation design and explain how it
can answer the research question(s).
•
Explain the sampling technique, and justify how this technique will help to answer the research
question.
•
Explain potential ethical issues for this evaluation design. Analyze the implications of the ethical
issues and explain how you would respond to them
•
Explain the findings you would anticipate if you conducted the research and implemented the
evaluation design to evaluate the program, problem, or policy. Assure that your explanation is
appropriate for your intended audience.
•
Cover page
•
Executive summary (abstract): This should be written after your Final Evaluation Design is complete
and consists of a brief (usually one paragraph) summary of the design.
•
Revised Week 3 Assignment
•
Revised Week 7 Assignment
•
Description and justification of the analytical techniques (descriptive statistics, inferential statistics,
measures of association, and regression analysis) that you think are most appropriate for your
evaluation
•
References page
Your Final Project must demonstrate both breadth and depth of knowledge and critical thinking
appropriate to graduate-level scholarship. It must follow APA Publication Manual guidelines and be
free of typographical, spelling, and grammatical errors. The project should be 15–18 pages in length
(double-spaced), not including the title page, the Executive Summary, and references.
Be sure to support your Final Project with specific references to all resources used in its preparation.
You must use a minimum of 10 scholarly resources.
MMPA 6480/5480, NPMG 6480/5480, MSEM 6480/5480, MMPP 6480: Applied Research and Evaluation
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.ahrq.gov/ American
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). (2014). Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/racial-justice/racial-profiling
American Society for Public Administration (ASPA). (Revised 2013). ASPA code of ethics. Retrieved from
http://www.aspanet.org/public/ASPA/Resources/Code_of_Ethics/ASPA/Resource
s/Code%20of%20Ethics1.aspx?hkey=acd40318-a945-4ffc-ba7b-18e037b1a858 Bureau of Labor
Statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved June 7, 2014, from www.bls.gov Carnochan, S., Samples, M., Myers, M., &
Austin, M. J. (2013). Performance measurement challenges in nonprofit human service organizations.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Cave, E., & Holm, S. (2003). Milgram and Tuskegee: Paradigm
research projects in bioethics. Health Care Analysis, 11(1), 27–40. Center for Political Communication.
(2013). University of Delaware Center for Political Communication: September 2013 national agenda
poll. Retrieved from http://www.udel.edu/cpc/research/fall2013/National_Agenda_2013_Topline_Full.
pdf © 2014 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 2 of 5 Centers for Disease Control. (2013). 2013 CDC health
disparities and inequalities report. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/minorityhealth/CHDIReport.html
Delaware Health & Social Services. (2008). 2008 Delaware racial and ethnic disparities: Health status
report card. Retrieved from http://www.dhss.delaware.gov/dhss/dph/mh/files/2008dredreportcard.pdf
Delaware Natural Resources Defense Council. (2011). Testing the waters. Retrieved from
http://www.nrdc.org/water/oceans/ttw/sumdel.pdf Edin, K., & Pirog, M. A. (2014). Special symposium
on qualitative and mixed-methods for policy analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis Management, 33(2),
345–349. Foley, J. (n.d.). A tale of two worlds. Retrieved June 7, 2014, from http://ensia.com/voices/atale-of-two-worlds/ Friends National Resource Center. (2009). Using qualitative data in program
evaluation. Retrieved from http://friendsnrc.org/using-qualitative-in-program-evaluation Gallup. (n.d.).
Retrieved June 8, 2014, from http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx?ref=b Gallup. (2013). How does Gallup
polling work? Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/101872/how-does-gallup-polling-work.aspx
Gallup. (2013). Understanding Gallup’s likely voter procedures for presidential elections. Retrieved from
http://www.gallup.com/poll/111268/how-gallups-likely-votermodels-work.aspx Garson, G. D. (2009,
April 4). Logistic regression. Retrieved from http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/logistic.htm
Harding, D. J., Wyse, J. J. B., Dobson, C., & Morenoff, J. D. (2014). Making ends meet after prison. Journal
of Policy Analysis Management, 33(2), 440–470. © 2014 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 3 of 5 Hatry, H. P.
(2013). Sorting the relationships among performance measurement, program evaluation, and
performance management. New Directions for Evaluation, 2013(137), 19–32. Hill, J. (n.d.). Introduction
to descriptive statistics. University of Illinois, Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Retrieved
June 7, 2014, from http://mste.illinois.edu/hill/dstat/dstat.html Johnson, G. (2014). Research methods
for public administrators (3rd ed.). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Jones, J. M. (2014, January). Record-high
42% of Americans identify as independents. Gallup Politics. Retrieved from
http://www.gallup.com/poll/166763/record-highamericans-identify-independents.aspx Laureate
Education (Producer). (2013a). Central tendency and variability [Multimedia file]. Baltimore, MD:
Author. Laureate Education (Producer). (2014). Correlation and introduction to regression. [Multimedia
file] Baltimore, MD: Author. Laureate Education. . (2013b). New Harbor, Delaware and sampling design. .
Baltimore, MD: Author. Laureate Education (Producer). (2013c). Virtual community. [Multimedia file].
Baltimore, MD: Author. Lee Abbott, M., & McKinney, J. (2012). Learning from populations: Censuses and
samples. In Understanding and applying research design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. © 2014
Laureate Education, Inc. Page 4 of 5 Litman, T. (2008). Evaluating research quality: Guidelines for
scholarship. Victoria, British Columbia: Victoria Transport Quality Institute. McCauley, C. (2012). Testing
theories of radicalization in polls of U.S. Muslims. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 12(1), 296–
311. Public Policy Polling. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/ Public Policy
Research. (2002). Comparing recyclers and nonrecyclers in N/NE Portland: Implications for increasing
participation in the curbside program. Retrieved from
http://www.publicpolicyresearch.net/documents/recycling.PDF Randles, J. M. (2014). Partnering and
parenting in poverty: A qualitative analysis of a relationship skills program for low-income, unmarried
families. Journal of Policy Analysis Management, 33(2), 385–412. Rasmussen Reports. (2014). Daily
presidential tracking poll. Retrieved from
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/
daily_presidential_tracking_poll Silver, N. (2012). Which polls fared best (and worst) in the 2012
presidential election? New York Times, November 12, 2012. Retrieved from
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/10/which-polls-fared-best-andworst-in-the-2012presidential-race/?_r=0 State of Delaware Division of Watershed Stewardship. (2014). Retrieved from
http://www.dnrec.delaware.gov/swc/wa/Pages/PollutionControlStrategiesandTrib
utaryActionTeams.aspx StatPac. (2009). Qualities of a good question. Retrieved from
http://www.statpac.com/surveys/question-qualities.htm © 2014 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 5 of 5
Surveyspro. (2009). Reporting survey results. Retrieved from http://www.esurveyspro.com/articlereporting-survey-results.aspx Taber, D. R., Chriqui, J. F., Powell, L., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2013). Association
between state laws governing school meal nutrition content and student weight status: Implications for
new USDA school meal standards. JAMA Pediatrics, 167(6), 513–519. Trochim, W. M. K. (2006, October
20). Inferential statistics. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statinf.php United
Nations. (n.d.). Official documents and bibliographic databases. Retrieved June 7, 2014, from
http://www.un.org/en/databases/ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2014). Retrieved from
http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations Vaterlaus, J., & Higginbotham, B. (2011). Qualitative program
evaluation methods. NCSU: Raleigh, NC. Retrieved from http://ncsu.edu/ffci/publications/2011/v16- n12011-spring/vaterlaus-higginbotham.php Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2004). Outcome
of Washington state’s research-based programs for juvenile offenders. Retrieved from
www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/852
Due by Sunday Feb 4, 2018
Running head: LEXINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY
Lexington Public Library Surveillance Policy
Dominic Norwood
Walden University
1
LEXINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY
2
Lexington Public Library
The Lexington Public Library comprises of six library branches that serve the city of
Lexington and the surrounding central Kentucky counties. The branches are The Village Branch,
Beaumont, Eastside, Northside, Tate’s Creek branches and the largest of them all- the downtown
Lexington Central library. Through its services, the library meets the needs of more than 300,000
members of the public of all ages. Over the years the literature material has been updated, and
currently, it has over 560,000 items which are a combination of a wide variety of books,
audiobooks, e-books, magazines, movies, music and much more (Lexington Public Library,
2017).
The facility managed to serve roughly 2 million visitors last year, and at the same time
maintains an online presence that saw it get over 8 million visitors. Additionally, the library uses
a mobile application that was used over 6 million of its members. Despite the great increase and
availability of a wide array of digital material, print formats were still preferred taking about 59
percent, with the DVDs preferred at 22 percent, while the audiobooks and CDs took up 9 and 4
percent respectively (Lexington Public Library, 2016).
The organization’s vision is lifetime connection and dedication to the community while
the mission is in the connection, stimulation of ideas and changing of people’s lives. The main
values are excellence the in the type of service that it offers, equality in the way they treat both
visitors and their staff. It also focuses on integrity which is aimed at maintaining the trust of the
community that it serves, stewardship and finally passion. The strategic goals are in six main
areas of access, education, stewardship, culture, space, and inclusivity (Lexington Public
Library, 2017).
LEXINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY
3
Video surveillance policy
The policy that would benefit from a detailed analysis is done on video surveillance.
Video surveillance has many benefits to any organization from a small retail shop to facilities
that are massive. Some of the advantages of video surveillance are that it helps in enhancement
of security through deterrence, it also helps the law enforcement in the apprehension of
criminals, and it can also serve the purpose of exonerating someone that as wrongfully charged
and so much more (Randall and Newell, 2014). At Lexington library, video surveillance is used.
However, such usage requires a policy to guide how it is operated and also enforcement of
various rules that revolve around such practices.
The main purpose of the policy is in maintaining the safety and security of the
environment and in extension the customers and staff. The video equipment has been stationed at
various locations within the Lexington library facilities and is always running. At the entrance to
the main building, clear signs have been fixed to warn the public of the security camera that is in
operation with and around the premises. The surveillance system helps Lexington Library be
able to keep the environment secure, the organization’s assets, the property, the customers, and
the staff members. There are operation procedures in place that guide the usage of the footage in
line with the existing institutional law and those of the local authorities.
Research Question
a) What are the benefits of having a video surveillance policy to Lexington Library
systems? What improvements or changes can be made to the video surveillance policy of
Lexington Library systems to keep to the organization’s strategic goals as well as address
the privacy and legal concerns when it comes to video surveillance?
LEXINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY
4
Evaluation design and validity and reliability
The evaluation design strategy will be in the form of qualitative and quantitative analysis
of available information on the matter of surveillance. That will take the form of a thorough
analysis of documents; digital content such emails that may be available in the public domain or
by requesting for them in line with the freedom of information laws. Additionally, various
stakeholders will also use semi-structured interviews when carrying out the analysis. The
individuals that will be engaged in the interviews will be the once that were a part of in the
decision making the process at various stages of the creation of the policy, installation of the
equipment, their management, and any other activities related to the surveillance process.
By using the qualitative and quantitative strategies stated above will help in gathering
information will provide more detailed information on the library systems and the surveillance
policies that may be in place, and the reasons behind the changes that have been implemented
and also those that have led to policy changes in the past. The qualitative techniques such as
interviews will provide direct feedback and also allow for the interviewer to gauge the feedback,
get more information that would have otherwise have been left out; they are also able to notice
any non-verbal responses that can only be possible through a face to face analysis (Johnson,
2014). By studying material and documents, the researchers will be in a position of gathering
more information and also in the greater level of detail. By interviewing the stakeholders, I will
be able to get first-hand information relating to various issues about the surveillance policy and
the strategies that have been applied.
LEXINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY
5
References
Johnson, G. (2014). Research methods for public administrators (3rd ed.). Armonk, NY: M. E.
Sharpe.
Lexington Public Library (2016). 2016 Annual Report. Retrieved December 15, 2017, from
Lexington Public Library https://www.lexpublib.org/sites/default/files/file_uploads/annualreport2016-web.pdf
Lexington Public Library (2017). Strategic Plan.Retrieved December 15, 2017, from Lexington
Public Library on, https://www.lexpublib.org/strategic-plan
Randall, D.P and Newell, B.C. (2014). The Panoptic Librarian: The Role of Video Surveillance
in the Modern Public Library. Proceedings of the 2014 iConference, pp. 508-21 (2014).
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2380203

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP