I need to make sure that the article I chose is sufficient and related to t tests. If it is I need to write a 2- to 3-page critique of the article. In your critique, include responses to the following:Why did the authors use this t test?Do you think it’s the most appropriate choice? Why or why not?Did the authors display the data?Do the results stand alone? Why or why not?

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Volume 19 ? Number 1 ? Fall 2007 ? pp. 32–64
More Than One Gap:
Dropout Rate Gaps Between and Among
Black, Hispanic, and White Students
Dick M. Carpenter II & Al Ramirez
University of Colorado, Colorado Springs
This study is the second in a series of investigations designed to
explore issues surrounding the achievement gap, or, as concluded
in our prior work, achievement gaps. The first study (Carpenter,
Ramirez, & Severn, 2006) used data from the National Education
Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS: 88) to examine nuances of
academic achievement gaps among Black, White, and Hispanic
students, with a particular focus on not only gaps between groups
but also within groups. Findings from the analysis showed
unique patterns and multiple achievement gaps, both between
and within groups. In fact, results indicated within-group gaps
were often more significant than gaps between groups.
This research extends that effort by examining variables
associated with dropout behavior as a measure of achievement
gaps. As in the first study, comparisons were made among Black,
White, and Hispanic students, paying particular attention to
gaps in dropout rates both between and within groups. The
research progressed in two phases. Phase I used the same variables from the prior investigation to determine if the patterns
among independent variables would prove consistent with a different dependent variable (dropout status rather than academic
achievement on tests). Phase II added another index of variables
more conceptually aligned with dropout behavior.
Results from Phase I showed little consistency with findings
from our first investigation and the resulting logistic hierarchi32
Copyright © 2007 Prufrock Press, P.O. Box 8813, Waco, TX 76714
The achievement gap, traditionally measured by test scores, also can
be documented by dropout behavior. Examining dropout behavior
among Black, White, and Hispanic students, with a particular focus
on gaps within groups and not just between Whites and minorities,
shows a clearer picture of the achievement gap. The results of our study
show multiple achievement gaps both between and within groups, ultimately concluding that within-group gaps were often more significant
than gaps between groups. Through hierarchical linear modeling, we
and number of suspensions. Hispanic and White students showed three
additional predictors in common—time spent on homework, gender,
and family composition. White and Black students shared only one
common predictor beyond suspensions and being held back: parental
involvement. Black and Hispanic students shared no additional common predictors. Finally, race/ethnicity generally proved not to be a
significant predictor of dropping out. Gaps within groups may be more
significant than those between groups. Such differences further reinforce our concern about the practice of establishing policy initiatives
that conflate all minority group students into a monolithic whole. Our
research suggests that policy makers and school leaders should craft
dropout prevention policies and programs with sufficient flexibility to
allow school-level personnel to individualize said policies and practices
based on local conditions.
Carpenter, D. M., II, & Ramirez, A. (2007). More than one gap: Dropout rate gaps
between and among Black, Hispanic, and White students. Journal of Advanced
Academics, 19, 32–64.
found two common predictors for all three groups—being held back
Dropout Rates
cal generalized linear models (HGLM) explained little variance.
HGLM results from Phase II indicated some notable patterns
when comparing models between Black, White, and Hispanic
students. Specifically, significant predictors for White and
Hispanic students showed some commonality between groups,
but significant predictors for Black students showed less overlap
with the other two student groups. Finally, Phase II models also
explained little overall variance.
Literature Review
In the large and growing literature on closing the achievement gap, a common theme is a singular definition of the term.
Yet, as we demonstrated in a prior study, this singular definition
fails to describe the actual multilayered definition of differences
in achievement, whereby there is not one gap but many gaps
(Carpenter et al., 2006). Moreover, while the singular definition
typically describes achievement differences between White and
minority students, our results indicated within-group gaps can
be significantly greater than differences between groups. Indeed,
when examining significant predictors among Black, White, and
Hispanic students, results indicated substantive overlap between
variables in best fit models for each group. By substantive overlap,
we mean all three models included socioeconomic status (SES),
inclusion in an ESL program, and parental involvement, and
coefficient directions across groups were identical. Increases in
SES and parental involvement resulted in higher math achievement. Moreover, the Black and White models shared homework
as a significant predictor, and Hispanic and White models shared
number of units in Algebra I.
A second common theme in the achievement gap literature,
including our prior work (Carpenter et al., 2006), is the use of academic achievement as the dominant dependent variable, as often
measured by test scores and other related indicators. The use of
dropout status to measure gaps in achievement is less common.
This is an unfortunate dynamic given the general acknowledg34
Journal of Advanced Academics
Carpenter & Ramirez
ment that dropout rates are comparably greater among minority
students (Darling-Hammond, 2006, 2007). Indeed, authors such
as Roscigno (1999) note that minority students, particularly Black
students, drop out at higher levels than their White counterparts.
However, much of this research is based on qualitative studies that
are informative, but often lack the depth of investigation and the
precision needed to guide viable policy initiatives.
For example, among the most widely circulated reports specifically on the Hispanic dropout problem is Secada et al. (1998).
This effort sought to collect expert opinions from researchers
and practitioners about the causes and solutions to the problem. Public hearings and commissioned papers were part of the
methodology as well. In another example, Neumann (1996)
used observations, surveys, and interviews with students, teachers, and school administrators to understand the factors that
explained the low dropout rate for Mexican American students
in one California high school. He identified a myriad of programs and policies as the reason for the low number of dropouts.
In an earlier study of dropouts in California, Pulido (1991) also
used interviews and observations to collect data from 18 high
schools with high Hispanic enrollments and low dropout rates.
His purpose was to identify factors that contributed to the high
retention and correlate these findings with the literature about
effective schools.
Researchers who take a quantitative approach to the examination of dropping out commonly draw on large national datasets,
such as those produced by the National Center for Education
Statistics (NCES) or the U.S. Census Bureau. For example,
using the High School and Beyond database, Melnick and Sabo
(1992) investigated the influence of interscholastic sports on
dropping out. They found this aspect of school offered a limited deterrence for a small number of students. Perrira, Harris,
and Lee (2006) examined data from the National Longitudinal
Study of Adolescent Health and found human, cultural, community, and family capital explained why second generation
children of immigrants were at higher risk of dropping out than
first generation children. The researchers looked at data from
Volume 19 ? Number 1 ? Fall 2007
Dropout Rates
the in-school survey of students, which included more than
12,000 participants. The study found differences in the influence
of the selected variables both between and within ethnic and
racial groups. Generational differences also were reported within
immigrant groups.
The National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988
(NELS: 88) also has seen particularly frequent use in dropout
research (Warren & Lee, 2003; Yin & Moore, 2004). For example, Lan and Lanthier (2003) used NELS: 88 to measure the
relationship between dropping out and academic performance,
relationships with teachers, relationships with peers, perceptions
of school, participation in school activities, motivation for school
work, effort expended in school work, self-esteem, and locus of
control. Results showed a developmental pattern of the personal attributes of dropout students and identified the transition
to high school as a particularly critical time for interventions.
Croninger and Lee (2001) examined the relationship between
social capital and dropping out using the NELS: 88 database and
discovered that teachers are an important source of social capital,
which can reduce the probability of dropping out by as much as
half. Students with past academic difficulties find guidance and
assistance from teachers especially helpful. Teachman, Paasch,
and Carver (1996) likewise studied the relationship between
dropping out and social capital using the NELS: 88 database
and found changing schools is particularly detrimental.
Some authors, such as Lee and Burkam (2003) and
Goldschmidt and Wang (1999), examined school factors and
the likelihood of dropping out also using NELS: 88. Lee and
Burkam applied multilevel methods to explore the influence
of school factors, such as curriculum, size, and social relations,
taking into account students’ academic and social background,
including race/ethnicity. In schools that offer mainly academic
courses, students are less likely to drop out. Similarly, students in
smaller schools more often stay in school, as do those where relationships between teachers and students are positive. For their
part, Goldschmidt and Wang used NELS: 88 data to study early
dropouts, those who leave in middle school, and late dropouts,
Journal of Advanced Academics
Carpenter & Ramirez
those who leave in high school, paying particular attention to
differences between the groups. Results showed a general difference in significant predictors between the groups, although
being held back is the strongest predictor of dropping out for
both early and late leavers.
As revealing as these studies are, however, they do not necessarily focus exclusively on differences between groups based
on race/ethnicity. The authors do include race/ethnicity in the
research, but it is more often used as a covariate. Moreover, a
robust collection of empirical studies that examine dropout status as a measure of achievement gap is missing. This study seeks
to contribute to that collection by focusing on both dropout status as the measure of achievement gaps and differences within
groups as well as between.
Predictors of Dropout Behavior
To do so, we examined within-group differences in the likelihood of dropping out for Black, Hispanic, and White students
separately by running hierarchical generalized linear models for
each group. We also combined all three groups into one sample
to examine if there were significant differences in the likelihood
of dropping out based on race/ethnicity. As described in detail
below, we proceeded in two phases. Phase I included variables
from our first achievement gaps study to determine if those same
variables proved significant with dropping out as the dependent
variable rather than academic achievement. Because Phase I
results proved inconclusive, Phase II introduced an additional set
of predictor variables more closely aligned with dropping out.
The Phase I variables included: time spent on homework during the week outside of school, SES, number of units of Algebra
1, participation in an ESL program, language other than English
regularly spoken at home, family composition, parental involvement, student race/ethnicity, teacher certification, enrollment,
percentage of White students in the school, school type, and
urbanicity. To varying degrees, each of these variables has been
shown to influence the likelihood of dropping out. Beginning
Volume 19 ? Number 1 ? Fall 2007
Dropout Rates
with variables at the student/family level, Alexander, Entwisle,
and Kabbani (2001) considered at-risk factors for dropping out
among children in the Baltimore public schools and identified
socioeconomic status of the family as a key predictor. Cairns,
Cairns, and Neckerman (1989) also found socioeconomic status
of the family along with aggressive behavior and poor grades as
variables associated with dropping out.
Language issues also have been examined as associated with
dropping out, such as Theobald’s (2003) study of dropout statistics relative to the kind of English language acquisition program
to which Hispanic students were assigned. Additionally, family
characteristics, such as family composition, influence decisions to
complete high school (Astone & McLanahan, 1994). Rumberger,
Ghatak, Poulos, Ritter, and Dornbusch (1990) underscored the
value of parent involvement in education, while pointing out that
students who are on their own regarding schooling decisions are
at higher risk of leaving school before graduation.
How students use their time in and out of school, such as
time spent on homework at home or courses they take at school,
has been analyzed in connection with dropout statistics. Natriello,
McDill, and Pallas (1985) showed a curvilinear relationship
between time spent on homework and likelihood of dropping out,
and Fratt (2006) reported on the positive relationship between
success in algebra courses and completing high school.
Among the school-level variables, several authors have examined the relationships between dropping out and school size and
composition of the student body. Merritt (1983) and Alspaugh
(1998) concluded students in larger schools drop out more often,
as do students in schools with a greater percentage of minorities (Rumberger & Palardy, 2005). School type and urbanicity
likewise appear to predict dropping out. Specifically, Hendrie
(2004) reported students in private schools drop out less than
those in public schools, and rural school students drop out more
often than those in other settings (Roscigno & Crowley, 2001).
Finally, numerous authors posit a relationship between teacher
quality and student outcomes, concluding lower teacher qual-
Journal of Advanced Academics
Carpenter & Ramirez
ity contributes to a greater likelihood of dropping out (DarlingHammond, 2006; Davis & Dupper, 2004; Heck, 2007).
The Phase II variables included: if the student was ever held
back, number of suspensions, inclusion in a dropout program,
country of birth, gender, hours per day watching TV, hours per
week spent working, hours per week in extracurricular activities, how often the student uses a computer per week, number
of siblings who dropped out, 8th-grade reading test score, 8thgrade math test score, 10th-grade reading test score, 10th-grade
math test score, percent of 10th graders who drop out before
graduation, percent of students in a dropout program, if a test
is required for graduation, if the school district allows choice in
enrollment, the level of gang problems in the school, and how
much influence gangs have in compelling others to dropout.
The decision to include some of these variables is rather selfevident, such as inclusion in a dropout program, number of siblings
who have dropped out, percent of students in a dropout program,
or the amount of influence gangs play in compelling others to
dropout. For other variables, the conceptual alignment is not as
self-evident but still conceptually rational. For example, poor academic achievement has been shown to be related to dropping out
(Natriello et al., 1985; Reyes & Jason, 1991), as has an increase
in the number of hours of paid employment (Warren & Cataldi,
2006; Warren & Lee, 2003), retention in a grade (Frey, 2005;
Shepard & Smith, 1990), and exclusion from school for disciplinary reasons (Kokko, Tremblay, Lacourse, Nagin, & Vitaro, 2006).
Still other variables may not appear closely aligned to dropout behavior, but have been shown to be important nonetheless.
For example, student gender interacts with dropout behavior
when teenage girls are pregnant (Turner, 1995; Warren & Lee,
2003) or begin families without marrying (Cairns et al., 1989).
Both circumstances serve as predictors of dropping out of high
school (Manlove, 1998). Another includes how students use
their time outside of school, such as in extracurricular activities.
McNeal (1995) proffered that not all student participation in
extracurricular activities has the same effect of deterring students
from leaving school. For example, sports and fine arts do appear
Volume 19 ? Number 1 ? Fall 2007
Dropout Rates
to reduce dropout rates of participants, but academic and vocational clubs do not. He went on to point out that the strength of
these dynamics supersedes race, economic status, and gender.
Another predictor with somewhat mixed results includes a
student’s country of birth. Specifically, children of first generation immigrant parents with greater social and cultural capital
drop out less often than those with less capital, but that dynamic
wanes among children of parents in second generations and
beyond (Perrira et al., 2006). Finally, some have examined the
relationship between school reform efforts and their effect on
dropout activities (Natriello et al., 1985). High-stakes testing
(Shriberg & Shriberg, 2006) and exit examinations from high
school (Viadero, 2005) are two factors cited as contributing to
higher dropout rates.
Using the aforementioned variables, this study was implemented in two phases. The first phase applied models resulting
from our 2006 research (called Study 1 hereafter) using dropout
status as the dependent variable, rather than academic achievement. In so doing, we sought to determine if (a) the same predictors from Study 1 and (b) the pattern of within-group and
between-group gaps proved consistent with a different dependent variable. Because the models from Study 1 did not produce similar results with the dropout status dependent variable,
we proceeded to a second phase wherein we modeled dropout
status among Black, White, and Hispanic students using the
aforementioned additional index of variables more conceptually
aligned to dropping out. Specific procedures in each phase are
included below.
Data and Sample
Data for this study came from NELS: 88. Conducted by the
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), NELS: 88
Journal of Advanced Academics
Carpenter & Ramirez
represents the third in a series of longitudinal studies of cohorts
of American students. NELS: 88 began collecting data on students during their eighth-grade year and continued into high
school, postsecondary education, and into the labor force. The
design for NELS: 88 included a questionnaire and a cognitive
test for each student in the sample. Questionnaires also were
administered to each student’s parents, school principal, and two
of his or her teachers.
Student questionnaires asked for information about selected
background characteristics, including English language proficiency, attitudes, career and college plans, school experience, and
extracurricular activities. Principals and headmasters answered
specific questions about the school. Parents reported on family resources, parent involvement in school, educational opportunities supported outside of school, and financial planning for
college. Two teachers of each sampled student completed a questionnaire designed to collect data and evaluations concerning
the educational progress and motivation of the student, the academic difficulty of the class in which the …
Purchase answer to see full

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP