The Wembley Stadium Project

Overview: The purpose of this assessment is to further your understanding of the directive approach for analyzing your chosen project. You will review the
quality standards and critique the communication and resource plans with clarity that offers further assistance for effective review. You are expected to gather
information from both the course and outside resources to assist in preparation for your thorough assessment of all knowledge areas at the end of the course.
Once complete, this milestone will become a component of the final project. …………………..
_milestone_three_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
The Wembley Stadium Project
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

QSO 645 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: The purpose of this assessment is to further your understanding of the directive approach for analyzing your chosen project. You will review the
quality standards and critique the communication and resource plans with clarity that offers further assistance for effective review. You are expected to gather
information from both the course and outside resources to assist in preparation for your thorough assessment of all knowledge areas at the end of the course.
Once complete, this milestone will become a component of the final project.
Prompt: Assess project control techniques, analyze the communication plan, and make recommendations regarding resource management.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
VII.
In this section, you will assess the project control techniques utilized during the project, specifically:
A. Determine the quality auditing tools and techniques executed during control.
B. Recommend specific reporting metrics from which the project could have benefited, considering how elements of Earned Value Management
were used to help control the project.
VIII.
In this section, you will break down the communication plan used during the project, including its elements (e.g., frequency of meetings, types of
meetings, and tools used), specifically:
A. Critique the communication tactics chosen for the project.
B. Propose communication strategies that would have been more appropriate for the project, providing reasoning for your proposal.
IX.
Resource Management
A. Describe the resource conflict within the project and how it was handled.
B. Recommend best practices in resource management that could have been used in this project, including those related to staffing needs and
ways to avoid resource conflict.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper should be a 4- to 5-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch
margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
Critical Elements
Project Control
Techniques: Quality
Auditing
Proficient (100%)
Needs Improvement (75%)
Not Evident (0%)
Determines the quality auditing Determines the quality auditing Does not determine the quality
tools and techniques executed tools and techniques executed
auditing tools and techniques
during control
during control, but determination executed during control
is incomplete or contains
inaccuracies
Value
15
Project Control
Recommends specific reporting
Techniques: Reporting metrics from which the project
Metrics
could have benefited,
considering how elements of
Earned Value Management were
used to help control the project
Recommends reporting metrics Does not recommend reporting
from which the project could have metrics from which the project
benefited, but recommendations could have benefited
are inappropriate, lack specificity,
or do not consider how Earned
Value Management was used, or
submission contain inaccuracies
15
Communication Plan: Critiques the communication
Critique
tactics chosen for the project
Critiques the communication
Does not critique the
tactics chosen for the project, but communication tactics chosen for
critique is inappropriate or
the project
cursory or contains inaccuracies
15
Communication Plan: Proposes communication
Strategies
strategies that would have been
more appropriate for the
project, providing reasoning for
proposal
Proposes alternate
Does not propose alternate
communication strategies for the communication strategies for the
project, but the proposal is
project
inappropriate, without reason, or
contains inaccuracies
15
Resource Management: Describes the resource conflict
Resource Conflict
within the project and how it
was handled
Describes the resource conflict
Does not describe the resource
within the project, but description conflict and how it was handled
is cursory, does not address how
conflict was handled, or contains
inaccuracies
15
Resource Management: Recommends best practices in
Best Practices
resource management that
could have been used in this
project, including those related
to staffing needs and ways to
avoid resource conflict
Recommends best practices in
Does not recommend best practices
resource management that could in resource management that could
have been used in this project,
have been used in this project
but recommendations are
inappropriate, ignore issues of
staffing or resource conflict, or
contain inaccuracies
15
Articulation of
Response
Submission has no major errors Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact readability
and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization that
prevent understanding of ideas
Total
10
100%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP